American lobster fisheries focused – The Martha’s Winery Instances

Oceana, a nonprofit ocean conservation group, introduced in an early September press launch that Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch, a sustainable seafood advisory listing, added “more than a dozen fisheries” to its “red list” as a result of they “currently pose risks to the survival of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales.” These embody American lobster fisheries in southern New England, a livelihood supply for plenty of the Island’s fishermen and a well-liked summertime meals, and “other trap, pot, and gillnet fisheries.”

In keeping with the discharge, the crimson listing “recommends that businesses and consumers avoid purchasing certain seafood because they are caught or farmed in ways that have a high risk of harming wildlife or the environment.” The discharge mentioned over 25,000 eating places, shops, and distributors, together with massive corporations like Compass Group, have dedicated to avoiding “red-listed seafood.” In flip, “Seafood Watch assessments and recommendations have proven to be a powerful motivator for fisheries with significant conservation challenges to improve their practices … and regain market access,” based on the discharge. An instance the discharge gave was how the Louisiana shrimp fishery “worked to change state law to improve sea turtle conservation regulations” in 2015 to be faraway from the crimson listing. Seafood Watch has two different shade codes, inexperienced (most suitable option) and yellow (good various), amongst their seafood listings. 

Nevertheless, a few of the companions Seafood Watch listed on its web site, resembling Entire Meals and Pacific Catch, nonetheless promote lobsters. The Instances reached out to Seafood Look ahead to clarification however their representatives weren’t instantly out there for remark. 


The discharge factors to entanglements from “fishing gear used to catch lobster, crab, and other species” as one of many main threats, alongside collisions with vessels, to proper whales. The discharge states, “only around 330 North Atlantic right whales remain, including an estimated 80 breeding females.” In keeping with the discharge, ropes “have been seen wrapped around [the whales’] mouths, fins, tails, and bodies” slows them down and results in swimming, replica, and feeding difficulties. These points “can cause death.” Strains can “cut into the whales’ flesh,” which have severed fins and tails, minimize into bones, and led to “life-threatening infections.”

Oceana listed suggestions “to protect North Atlantic right whales while supporting a thriving fishing industry” within the launch. These embody decreasing the variety of vertical strains and gillnets within the water, growing various fishing gear like ropeless and pop-up gear, increasing seasonal closures “when and where whales are present,” and enhancing fisheries’ transparency and monitoring by “requiring public tracking of fishing vessels.” 

“It’s unfortunate that the government’s failure to update the safeguards to protect North Atlantic right whales is having such serious consequences on these fisheries. Both fisheries and whales can thrive if the National Marine Fisheries Service takes immediate action and creates effective measures for these whales,” Oceana marketing campaign director Gib Brogan mentioned in a press release. “Ordering lobster or crab should not mean jeopardizing the future of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales.”


Not everybody was thrilled to listen to concerning the crimson itemizing of American lobster fisheries. 

“This is most unfortunate as the Massachusetts commercial lobstermen are at the forefront in right whale conservation and this broad-brush approach is misleading,” Beth Casoni, govt director of the Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Affiliation, mentioned in an e mail. “To use this ecolabelling marketing scheme to deter consumers from purchasing the American lobster is not only discouraging to all of the commercial lobstermen and lobsterwomen here in the Commonwealth it is un-American.”


Casoni identified that industrial fisheries in the US are managed beneath the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which “mandates that these fisheries can only operate if they are sustainable.” She added that “the American Lobster fishery is one of the most sustainable fisheries.”

“The Massachusetts commercial lobstermen have been reducing risk to right whales for over 30 years now and are under the most restrictive rules anywhere,” Casoni mentioned, itemizing threat discount work completed by way of the Lobster Basis of Massachusetts and grants from the Massachusetts Environmental Belief “to develop the weak red and candy cane ropes that will break at or under 1,700 lbs” (New England Aquarium in Boston beneficial this threshold). 


Casoni additionally shared a brochure with The Instances titled “Massachusetts Commercial Lobstering: The Right Way,” which confirmed conservation efforts and restrictions for lobster fishing. An instance of restrictions consists of the 11,722 sq. miles of state waters “closed to lobstering” from February to April, extending to Might if whales are nonetheless current.

“[This] leaves the commercial fleet without any income for over 5 months as it takes one month on either end of the closures to haul and set their gear,” Casoni mentioned. “There is zero chance that a right whale could be entangled in Massachusetts waters during these months.”

The Instances reached out to the Martha’s Winery Fishermen’s Preservation Belief however has not obtained feedback concerning the crimson itemizing. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries director Daniel McKiernan additionally didn’t return a request for remark after preliminary e mail correspondence. 

Seafood Watch has a frequently asked questions web page relating to their resolution to make the latest crimson listings. Seafood Watch additionally issued a response in a follow-up press release on Friday, September 16, as a result of the unique announcement was “met by an abundance of misinformation that does not consider the full range of available scientific facts.” The brand new launch repeated a few of what the unique red-listing announcement mentioned but in addition added extra info, resembling how they made their “science-based assessments” and the 2022 U.S. District Courtroom case Center for Biological Diversity v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce.

“We stand by our science-based assessments,” the discharge said.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Adblock Detected

To browse our website, please disable your Ablocker.