County Reaches Decision With Fort Dick Canine Proprietor That ‘Reduces Menace By One-Third’; Residents Whose Cats Had been Killed Say That is Not Good Sufficient | Wild Rivers Outpost


Jessica Cejnar Andrews /
In the present day
@ 2:17 p.m.

County Reaches Decision With Fort Dick Canine Proprietor That ‘Reduces Menace By One-Third’; Residents Whose Cats Had been Killed Say That is Not Good Sufficient


In January, Krystol Berry and different Fort Dick residents supplied an $800 reward for info resulting in the seize of three canine they are saying have attacked their pet cats. | Picture courtesy of Krystol Berry

ADVERTISEMENT

Beforehand:

Canceled Administrative Hearing Proves Disappointing for Fort Dick Residents Still Dealing With Dogs Killing Cats

Dogs Killing Cats in the Fort Dick Area As County Animal Control Remains Short Staffed

ADVERTISEMENT

###

Del Norte County officers have reached a decision with the proprietor of three canine which have been attacking and killing pet cats within the Fort Dick space since December. However a minimum of one resident isn’t glad.

ADVERTISEMENT

The proprietor has agreed to relinquish one in all his canine and pay a $3,000 tremendous, Justin Riggs, the county’s director of animal companies, informed the Wild Rivers Outpost. The proprietor has additionally agreed to don’t have any “running-at-large” violations referring to the 2 remaining canine for 5 years.

“If we see the dogs at large or are given sufficient evidence of them running at large, the full amount of the original citation, less any payments that have been made, will be due,” Riggs informed the Outpost through e mail Friday. “This agreement provides a strong impetus for the owner to keep them completely contained and the removal of the most active dog from the pack will make them less likely to cause problems if they do escape.”

ADVERTISEMENT

However Krystol Berry stated the settlement the county reached with the proprietor wasn’t the decision county officers had mentioned along with her and her neighbor when she met with them on June 3.

The Quail Lane resident who caught the canine on digicam in mid-December attacking her cats stated turned all of the video footage she had over to County Counsel Joel Campbell-Blair, together with dates and notations on every automobile.

Throughout that June 3 assembly that included Riggs, County Administrative Officer Neal Lopez and supervisors Darrin Brief and Valerie Starkey, Berry stated Campbell-Blair assured her there was ample proof to cost the proprietor for every time his canine have been captured on digicam roaming the neighborhood.
She stated she was informed the proprietor’s fines can be “well over $10,000.”

“They said, ‘What we will offer him if he’s unable to pay his fines, in lieu of fines, he can surrender the dogs,’” Berry informed the Outpost. “So that was the deal. I said, ‘That’s great. Our neighborhood just wants the dogs gone. That’s our goal. We’re not concerned about the money.’ They said if he did pay the fines, the fines will go toward Animal Control and the dog program.”

That June 3 assembly got here after an administrative listening to between the county and the canine’ proprietor set for Might 20 was canceled. Berry stated she and a minimum of 20 folks have been planning to current proof at that listening to. However in keeping with Riggs, Campbell-Blair stated there wasn’t ample proof to show the canine have been doubtlessly harmful, which might have allowed the county to grab them.

Berry, who complained to the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors following that canceled listening to, stated Campbell-Blair had emailed her asking if she was prepared to offer him one other probability to go over the proof, which led to the June 3 assembly.

Berry stated she discovered concerning the settlement negotiated between the proprietor and the county from a consultant of the Humane Society of Del Norte, who requested her if she was pleased with the end result.

Although there haven’t been any experiences or digicam footage exhibiting canine roaming her neighborhood for the reason that proprietor and county negotiated, Berry stated she felt that the county modified the foundations of the sport. However, she stated, “we’re just never sure when these dogs are going to get loose.”

“I’m not going to bother with the county at all. I’m done,” Berry informed the Outpost. “It’s so blatant that the best interest of the public is not the best with what the county is looking for. An entire community was affected by this and they’re just concerned about collecting fees.”

Although she stated she’s grieving for the house owners of the cats that have been killed, Starkey stated the county wasn’t going to succeed in an answer that made everybody 100% blissful.

Nevertheless, whereas there wasn’t sufficient proof to make a “slam dunk case” for the canine to be labeled doubtlessly harmful, Starkey stated there was ample footage to show they weren’t contained. The fines can be $100 for the primary violation as much as $500 for a number of violations per canine, Starkey stated.

“He racked up a significant fine and we agreed in that meeting — they felt comfortable if we just fined the guy an enormous amount with the understanding that every time the dogs got out it was added to the fine. It’s not the best, but it’s something they could live with,” Starkey stated. “So they slapped the guy with a fine. He gets fined and now he’s like, ‘It’s $13,000. I can’t pay $13,000, can I negotiate?’”

Starkey stated she’s unsure why Berry and her neighbors really feel eradicating one of many canine — decreasing the menace “by a third by taking a dog” — isn’t a suitable consequence. However not one of the county’s choices have been going to be the most effective options, Starkey stated.

“We’ve learned we got to act swifter and get these animals, either (the owner) fined or make sure they’re secured. And we’ve learned a lot,” she informed the Outpost. “We’ve added more resources to Animal Control because we have additional Measure R money. We’re able to identify a problem. We have a third less threat because one dog has been impounded. He relinquished them and that’s what I’m having a hard time understanding — Krystol’s frustration.”

When the canine have been first caught on digicam attacking cats in December, residents stated county Animal Management was gradual to reply. Riggs stated that gradual response was attributable to a staffing scarcity that his division had been coping with for about eight years.

On the time, Riggs stated his division’s staffing stage was under 50 p.c. He solely had one animal management officer — Brittany Pratt — who additionally had to spend so much of her time caring for the animals on the shelter.

In Might, Riggs informed the Outpost that his division employed a brand new animal management officer and had prolonged a proposal to a second animal management candidate. The county additionally crammed a vacant assistant division head place in Animal Management Providers.

On Thursday, Berry stated when the canine have been first inflicting issues, each the sheriff’s workplace and Riggs suggested her and her neighbors to shoot them. Berry stated that was one thing she wished to keep away from.

“Obviously, I’m an animal lover. I don’t want to hurt somebody’s pet and that’s why it dragged out as long as it did,” she stated. “I was trying to avoid these dogs coming to harm. Unfortunately, it looks like that was probably the best option.”


SHARE →


Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Adblock Detected

To browse our website, please disable your Ablocker.